Tucker Carlson has been popular with white nationalists for awhile now. But he has cemented his reputation as one of their all-time immortals this week by proving not only that he can spew white-nationalist dogma on primetime TV and not get fired for it, but he can double down on the hatemongering and even gain the backing of conservative Jewish rabbis.
After Carlson regurgitated white-nationalist “replacement theory” in the context of American immigration and border issues last week, the Anti-Defamation League demanded Fox fire their most popular talk show host, and was refused by Fox’s corporate heads. So as Carlson then piled on the theory this week, white nationalists and their “redpilled” followers were practically pumping their fists in glee.
YouTube Video
“This week Tucker redpilled 4 million people and there’s nothing liberals can do about it,” tweeted Nick Fuentes, leader of the white-nationalist “Groyper Army” and its associated “America First” movement.
Fuentes later crowed again: “Daily reminder that replacement theory is now politically mainstream and there is nothing the ADL and SPLC can do about it.”
“This segment is one of the best things Fox News has ever aired and was filled with ideas and talking points VDARE.com pioneered many years ago,” the notorious white nationalist site VDare tweeted in response to Monday’s segment in which Carlson doubled down harder on the “replacement theory” rhetoric. “You should watch the whole thing.”
“Literal anti-white Jewish shit,” responded Mike Peinovich, the white nationalist host of The Daily Shoah, to the ADL’s criticism. “If what Tucker Carlson said was wrong, why not just argue with him and prove him to be so? Jews and their minions never present any arguments for their positions. Why should they be taken seriously?”
“Tucker Carlson confirms what white nationalists have been talking about for decades: the white population of the US and wider West is being deliberately and maliciously replaced,” tweeted the white nationalist Way of the World account. “They mean to take away power from us in our own lands by making us an electoral and social irrelevance.”
“Great segment mentioning unmentionable reality of demographic replacement,” tweeted Kevin MacDonald, an anti-Semitic academic beloved by neo-Nazis. “Doesn’t explicitly mention Whites but obviously implied.” He then described Carlson’s attack on the Anti-Defamation League as a “must-see for conservatives.”
This is not the first time that Carlson has made exactly these claims: He has touted the same theory regarding immigrants “replacing” current voters in various segments in the past couple of years. (It is, naturally, an utterly specious claim: Voting requires citizenship, meaning those new immigrants are not eligible even to apply for five years; the naturalization application process then typically takes 15 months. Moreover, the 700,000 new citizens who take the oath every year—after which they may finally vote—represent only 0.2% of the total U.S. population.)
Carlson already has a remarkable record of dabbling increasingly in white supremacist rhetoric dating back to 2006, including recently unearthed recordings of his ramblings on radio. His greatest hits include a regurgitation of neo-Nazi propaganda about “white genocide” in Africa, not to mention his mutual promotion of the white nationalist website VDare. There is a reason white supremacists love Carlson’s show, and why they assiduously watch it in hopes of picking up pointers.
Fox CEO Lachlan Murdoch defended Carlson, disingenuously claiming he had “decried and rejected replacement theory" when he said during the Thursday evening segment, “White replacement theory? No, no, this is a voting rights question.”
Murdoch noted that the ADL had once honored his father, Rupert Murdoch, with a leadership award, to which ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt replied that the award was granted “over a decade ago, but let me be clear that we would not do so today, and it does not absolve you, him, the network, or its board from the moral failure of not taking action against Mr. Carlson.”
And there was blowback for the ADL and Greenblatt. Former ADL chief Abraham Foxman criticized the call for Carlson’s firing: “Fox is not an anti-Semitic network,” he said. “It’s a lot of things but it’s not an anti-Semitic network and it’s certainly not an anti-Israel network.”
In Israel, an organization of traditional orthodox rabbis, the Coalition for Jewish Values, attacked the ADL’s stance, publishing a letter supported by 1,500 rabbis calling the accusation "grossly misplaced charges of antisemitism." It attacked Greenblatt, saying that "alas, the ADL has become markedly partisan under your leadership."
Carlson’s Monday segment featured an unusually long 20-minute monologue in which Carlson dismissed his critics as "the usual chorus of hyper-aggressive liars" and reiterated his thesis—namely, that Democrats support mass immigration because it increases their electoral advantage and power.
He also attacked the ADL by claiming that it had itself embraced “replacement” theory—for Israel rather than the United States—in the past, pointing to a paper in which the ADL (then under Foxman’s direction) argued against allowing more Palestinian refugees into Israel because it would lead to Jews becoming a “vulnerable minority” in their own nation.
“Why would any democratic nation make its own citizens less powerful?” Carlson said. “Isn’t that the deepest betrayal of all? In the words of the ADL, why would a government subvert its own sovereign existence? Good question. Maybe ADL President Jonathan Greenblatt will join ‘Tucker Carlson Tonight’ some time to explain and tell us whether that same principle applies to the United States.”
As Christopher Mathias notes, white nationalists were particularly enamored of this portion of the monologue, viewing it as the ultimate “gotcha” moment—one which, in fact, again echoed an argument they have made for decades.
“Demographic replacement, ADL, Israel, it’s all there … a full redpill,” commented Fuentes. “On primetime Fox News for 4 million mainstream conservatives. Can you feel it? We are inevitable.”
Greenblatt was interviewed by CNN’s Brian Stelter about the controversy, and noted that this reflects the raging epistemological battle that has warped Americans’ sense of shared reality and induced millions into embracing false information:
After Carlson regurgitated white-nationalist “replacement theory” in the context of American immigration and border issues last week, the Anti-Defamation League demanded Fox fire their most popular talk show host, and was refused by Fox’s corporate heads. So as Carlson then piled on the theory this week, white nationalists and their “redpilled” followers were practically pumping their fists in glee.
YouTube Video
“This week Tucker redpilled 4 million people and there’s nothing liberals can do about it,” tweeted Nick Fuentes, leader of the white-nationalist “Groyper Army” and its associated “America First” movement.
Fuentes later crowed again: “Daily reminder that replacement theory is now politically mainstream and there is nothing the ADL and SPLC can do about it.”
“This segment is one of the best things Fox News has ever aired and was filled with ideas and talking points VDARE.com pioneered many years ago,” the notorious white nationalist site VDare tweeted in response to Monday’s segment in which Carlson doubled down harder on the “replacement theory” rhetoric. “You should watch the whole thing.”
“Literal anti-white Jewish shit,” responded Mike Peinovich, the white nationalist host of The Daily Shoah, to the ADL’s criticism. “If what Tucker Carlson said was wrong, why not just argue with him and prove him to be so? Jews and their minions never present any arguments for their positions. Why should they be taken seriously?”
“Tucker Carlson confirms what white nationalists have been talking about for decades: the white population of the US and wider West is being deliberately and maliciously replaced,” tweeted the white nationalist Way of the World account. “They mean to take away power from us in our own lands by making us an electoral and social irrelevance.”
“Great segment mentioning unmentionable reality of demographic replacement,” tweeted Kevin MacDonald, an anti-Semitic academic beloved by neo-Nazis. “Doesn’t explicitly mention Whites but obviously implied.” He then described Carlson’s attack on the Anti-Defamation League as a “must-see for conservatives.”
This is not the first time that Carlson has made exactly these claims: He has touted the same theory regarding immigrants “replacing” current voters in various segments in the past couple of years. (It is, naturally, an utterly specious claim: Voting requires citizenship, meaning those new immigrants are not eligible even to apply for five years; the naturalization application process then typically takes 15 months. Moreover, the 700,000 new citizens who take the oath every year—after which they may finally vote—represent only 0.2% of the total U.S. population.)
Carlson already has a remarkable record of dabbling increasingly in white supremacist rhetoric dating back to 2006, including recently unearthed recordings of his ramblings on radio. His greatest hits include a regurgitation of neo-Nazi propaganda about “white genocide” in Africa, not to mention his mutual promotion of the white nationalist website VDare. There is a reason white supremacists love Carlson’s show, and why they assiduously watch it in hopes of picking up pointers.
Fox CEO Lachlan Murdoch defended Carlson, disingenuously claiming he had “decried and rejected replacement theory" when he said during the Thursday evening segment, “White replacement theory? No, no, this is a voting rights question.”
Murdoch noted that the ADL had once honored his father, Rupert Murdoch, with a leadership award, to which ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt replied that the award was granted “over a decade ago, but let me be clear that we would not do so today, and it does not absolve you, him, the network, or its board from the moral failure of not taking action against Mr. Carlson.”
And there was blowback for the ADL and Greenblatt. Former ADL chief Abraham Foxman criticized the call for Carlson’s firing: “Fox is not an anti-Semitic network,” he said. “It’s a lot of things but it’s not an anti-Semitic network and it’s certainly not an anti-Israel network.”
In Israel, an organization of traditional orthodox rabbis, the Coalition for Jewish Values, attacked the ADL’s stance, publishing a letter supported by 1,500 rabbis calling the accusation "grossly misplaced charges of antisemitism." It attacked Greenblatt, saying that "alas, the ADL has become markedly partisan under your leadership."
Carlson’s Monday segment featured an unusually long 20-minute monologue in which Carlson dismissed his critics as "the usual chorus of hyper-aggressive liars" and reiterated his thesis—namely, that Democrats support mass immigration because it increases their electoral advantage and power.
He also attacked the ADL by claiming that it had itself embraced “replacement” theory—for Israel rather than the United States—in the past, pointing to a paper in which the ADL (then under Foxman’s direction) argued against allowing more Palestinian refugees into Israel because it would lead to Jews becoming a “vulnerable minority” in their own nation.
“Why would any democratic nation make its own citizens less powerful?” Carlson said. “Isn’t that the deepest betrayal of all? In the words of the ADL, why would a government subvert its own sovereign existence? Good question. Maybe ADL President Jonathan Greenblatt will join ‘Tucker Carlson Tonight’ some time to explain and tell us whether that same principle applies to the United States.”
As Christopher Mathias notes, white nationalists were particularly enamored of this portion of the monologue, viewing it as the ultimate “gotcha” moment—one which, in fact, again echoed an argument they have made for decades.
“Demographic replacement, ADL, Israel, it’s all there … a full redpill,” commented Fuentes. “On primetime Fox News for 4 million mainstream conservatives. Can you feel it? We are inevitable.”
Greenblatt was interviewed by CNN’s Brian Stelter about the controversy, and noted that this reflects the raging epistemological battle that has warped Americans’ sense of shared reality and induced millions into embracing false information: