width="1260" height="657" src="https://crickettimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Robin-Uthappa-Hardik-Pandya-Abhinav-Mukund.webp" class="attachment-full size-full wp-post-image" alt="Robin Uthappa, Hardik Pandya, Abhinav Mukund" decoding="async" loading="lazy" style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;" srcset="https://crickettimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Robin-Uthappa-Hardik-Pandya-Abhinav-Mukund.webp 1260w, https://crickettimes.com/wp-content...ppa-Hardik-Pandya-Abhinav-Mukund-700x365.webp 700w, https://crickettimes.com/wp-content...ppa-Hardik-Pandya-Abhinav-Mukund-372x194.webp 372w, https://crickettimes.com/wp-content...ppa-Hardik-Pandya-Abhinav-Mukund-768x400.webp 768w, https://crickettimes.com/wp-content...appa-Hardik-Pandya-Abhinav-Mukund-150x78.webp 150w" sizes="(max-width: 1260px) 100vw, 1260px" />
In a closely contested encounter at Guyana, India faced a heart-wrenching defeat in the 2nd T20I against West Indies, leaving them trailing 2-0 in the ongoing 5-match series. While several factors contributed to India’s loss, it was one particular decision made by captain Hardik Pandya that attracted significant scrutiny and ignited discussions about his leadership abilities.
Yuzvendra Chahal‘s sensational 16th over, resulting in three crucial wickets, provided India with an opportunity to reclaim control of the match. As the game entered a crucial phase with West Indies needing 21 runs for victory, the choice of the bowler for the 18th over became pivotal. However, Pandya surprised many by opting to bring on Mukesh Kumar and Arshdeep Singh instead of persisting with the successful Chahal.
Also READ: Twitter lashes out at Hardik Pandya as India suffers a narrow defeat in the 2nd T20I against West Indies
The consequences of this decision were evident as West Indies managed to secure a two-wicket victory, raising questions about the rationale behind Pandya’s captaincy choices. Former Indian cricketers Robin Uthappa and Abhinav Mukund were among those who expressed their bewilderment over the move.
Mukund expressed his surprise at the decision to go back to Arshdeep when Chahal had already proven his effectiveness. He highlighted the strategic aspects, questioning why Pandya did not capitalize on Chahal’s success to close out the game.
“Ten times out of ten you would have gone with Chahal and tried to close out the game there, especially with Alzarri Joseph in there. I understand that the left-hander is still there, but you’ve got Hetmyer out in the previous over bowling a full one and you have the bigger boundary to deal with,” Mukund said on Jio Cinema.
“I was a bit baffled by the decision to go back to Arshdeep because he’s your strike bowler, your lead bowler. If you wanted to bowl him, you could bowl him in the 19th over, left Mukesh the last over, or even brought Arshdeep for the final over depending on the number of runs required,” he added.
Uthappa, known for his candid expressions, didn’t hold back in his assessment. Using a contemporary term, he stated, “I have one expression – one Gen-Z expression for this moment – ‘pooof’ and not in a nice way.” Uthappa highlighted the experience and mastery that Chahal possessed over the lower-order batsmen, emphasizing the missed opportunity to exploit his skills against West Indies’ tailenders.
Uthappa went on to point out the disparity between the capabilities of Chahal and the West Indies’ lower-order batsmen, suggesting that Pandya’s decision to turn away from Chahal was an error in judgment. He underlined that Chahal could have outsmarted the likes of Alzarri Joseph and Akeal Hosein in the crucial overs.
“The likes of Alzarri Joseph are not going to contend with the experience and class of a Yuzi Chahal. He knows how to bowl to these lower-order batsmen, he know how to get them out. And Akeal Hosein is not gonna take him on, not at that point with three overs to go. He would have backed himself with two overs to go perhaps, not three overs to go. So, you knew there was an error in judgement there,” said Uthappa.
Also READ: Rohit Sharma picks five best and unforgettable moments of his cricketing career
For latest cricket news & updates, visit CricketTimes.com.
In a closely contested encounter at Guyana, India faced a heart-wrenching defeat in the 2nd T20I against West Indies, leaving them trailing 2-0 in the ongoing 5-match series. While several factors contributed to India’s loss, it was one particular decision made by captain Hardik Pandya that attracted significant scrutiny and ignited discussions about his leadership abilities.
Yuzvendra Chahal‘s sensational 16th over, resulting in three crucial wickets, provided India with an opportunity to reclaim control of the match. As the game entered a crucial phase with West Indies needing 21 runs for victory, the choice of the bowler for the 18th over became pivotal. However, Pandya surprised many by opting to bring on Mukesh Kumar and Arshdeep Singh instead of persisting with the successful Chahal.
Also READ: Twitter lashes out at Hardik Pandya as India suffers a narrow defeat in the 2nd T20I against West Indies
The consequences of this decision were evident as West Indies managed to secure a two-wicket victory, raising questions about the rationale behind Pandya’s captaincy choices. Former Indian cricketers Robin Uthappa and Abhinav Mukund were among those who expressed their bewilderment over the move.
Mukund expressed his surprise at the decision to go back to Arshdeep when Chahal had already proven his effectiveness. He highlighted the strategic aspects, questioning why Pandya did not capitalize on Chahal’s success to close out the game.
“Ten times out of ten you would have gone with Chahal and tried to close out the game there, especially with Alzarri Joseph in there. I understand that the left-hander is still there, but you’ve got Hetmyer out in the previous over bowling a full one and you have the bigger boundary to deal with,” Mukund said on Jio Cinema.
“I was a bit baffled by the decision to go back to Arshdeep because he’s your strike bowler, your lead bowler. If you wanted to bowl him, you could bowl him in the 19th over, left Mukesh the last over, or even brought Arshdeep for the final over depending on the number of runs required,” he added.
One Gen-Z expression for this moment: Uthappa on Hardik’s decision
Uthappa, known for his candid expressions, didn’t hold back in his assessment. Using a contemporary term, he stated, “I have one expression – one Gen-Z expression for this moment – ‘pooof’ and not in a nice way.” Uthappa highlighted the experience and mastery that Chahal possessed over the lower-order batsmen, emphasizing the missed opportunity to exploit his skills against West Indies’ tailenders.
Uthappa went on to point out the disparity between the capabilities of Chahal and the West Indies’ lower-order batsmen, suggesting that Pandya’s decision to turn away from Chahal was an error in judgment. He underlined that Chahal could have outsmarted the likes of Alzarri Joseph and Akeal Hosein in the crucial overs.
“The likes of Alzarri Joseph are not going to contend with the experience and class of a Yuzi Chahal. He knows how to bowl to these lower-order batsmen, he know how to get them out. And Akeal Hosein is not gonna take him on, not at that point with three overs to go. He would have backed himself with two overs to go perhaps, not three overs to go. So, you knew there was an error in judgement there,” said Uthappa.
Also READ: Rohit Sharma picks five best and unforgettable moments of his cricketing career
For latest cricket news & updates, visit CricketTimes.com.